On the Unity of Logic: a Sequential, Unpolarized Approach
Norihiro Yamada

TL;DR
This paper proposes a unified, sequential, unpolarized game semantics framework for various logics, introducing a new linear logic negative ($LL^-$) and categorical semantics to reconcile classical, linear, and intuitionistic logics.
Contribution
It introduces $LL^-$ as a truly linear refinement of classical logic and develops a categorical and game semantics for it, unifying different logical systems.
Findings
Categorical semantics of $LL^-$ using why not monad ?
Sequential, unpolarized game semantics for $LL^-$
Linear strategies in game semantics
Abstract
The present work aims to give a unity of logic via standard sequential, unpolarized games. Specifically, our vision is that there must be mathematically precise concepts of linear refinement and intuitionistic restriction of logic such that the linear refinement of classical logic (CL) coincides with (classical) linear logic (LL), and its intuitionistic restriction with the linear refinement of intuitionistic logic (IL) into intuitionistic LL (ILL). However, LL is, in contradiction to the name, cannot be the linear refinement of CL at least from the game-semantic point of view due to its concurrency and polarization. In fact, existing game semantics of LL employs concurrency, which is rather exotic to game semantics of ILL, IL or CL. Also, linear negation in LL is never true in (game semantics of) ILL, IL or CL. In search for the truly linear refinement of CL, we carve out (a sequent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Formal Methods in Verification
