Time-based analysis of the NBA hot hand fallacy
Samuel Henry

TL;DR
This paper investigates the hot hand phenomenon in NBA basketball by analyzing shot sequences over two years, emphasizing the importance of timing between shots and showing that streaks are not sustained across years.
Contribution
It provides a detailed time-based analysis of the hot hand, highlighting the significance of shot timing and the lack of multi-year streak persistence.
Findings
Shot timing significantly affects hot hand evidence
Players do not maintain streaks across multiple years
Sequential shot outcomes are influenced by time intervals
Abstract
The debate surrounding the hot hand in the NBA has been ongoing for many years. However, many of the previous works on this theme has focused on only the very next sequential shot attempt, often on very select players. This work looks in more detail the effect of a made or missed shot on the next series of shots over a two-year span, with time between shots shown to be a critical factor in the analysis. Also, multi-year streakiness is analyzed, and all indications are that players cannot really sustain their good (or bad) fortune from year to year.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Sports Performance and Training · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
