Systematics and accuracy of VLBI astrometry: What can be learned from a comparison with Gaia Data Release 2

TL;DR

This study compares the ICRF3 radio source catalog with Gaia DR2 to evaluate positional accuracy and systematics, revealing improvements in ICRF3 and identifying residual errors and deformations across different frequency bands.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of ICRF3's accuracy and systematics through comparison with Gaia DR2, highlighting improvements and remaining issues in VLBI astrometry.

Findings

ICRF3 S/X-band shows smoother observation dependency than ICRF1 and ICRF2.

No significant glides found between ICRF3 S/X-band and Gaia DR2.

Systematic errors vary across frequency bands, with notable deformations in X/Ka-band.

Abstract

We aim to investigate the overall properties of the ICRF3 with the help of the Gaia Data release 2 (Gaia DR2). This could serve as an external check of the quality of the ICRF3. The radio source positions of the ICRF3 catalog were compared with the Gaia DR2 positions of their optical counterparts at G < 18.7. Their properties were analyzed in terms of the dependency of the quoted error on the number of observations, on the declination, and the global difference, the latter revealed by means of expansions in the vector spherical harmonics. The ICRF3 S/X-band catalog shows a more smooth dependency on the number of observations than the ICRF1 and ICRF2, while the K and X/Ka-band yield a dependency discrepancy at the number of observations of about 50. The rotation of all ICRF catalogs show consistent results, except for the X-component of the X/Ka-band which arises from the positional error in the non-defining sources. No significant glides were found between the ICRF3 S/X-band component and Gaia DR2. However, the K- and X/Ka- band frames show a dipolar deformation in Y-component of +50{\mu}as and several quadrupolar terms of 50{\mu}as in an absolute sense. A significant glide along Z-axis exceeding 200 {\mu}as in the X/Ka-band was also reported. These systematics in the ICRF catalog are shown to be less dependent on the limiting magnitude of the Gaia sample when the number of common sources is sufficient (> 100). The ICRF3 S/X-band catalog shows improved accuracy and systematics at the level of noise floor. But the zonal errors in the X/Ka-band should be noted, especially in the context of comparisons of multi-frequency positions for individual sources.