Quantum magic squares: dilations and their limitations
Gemma De las Cuevas, Tom Drescher, Tim Netzer

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether all quantum magic squares can be represented as convex combinations of quantum permutation matrices, revealing limitations in their dilation properties and classifying special cases.
Contribution
It demonstrates that not all quantum magic squares dilate to quantum permutation matrices and classifies those that do with commuting entries.
Findings
Not all quantum magic squares dilate to quantum permutation matrices.
Classified quantum magic squares that dilate to permutation matrices with commuting entries.
Established a lower bound on the diameter of the set of dilatable quantum magic squares.
Abstract
Quantum permutation matrices and quantum magic squares are generalizations of permutation matrices and magic squares, where the entries are no longer numbers but elements from arbitrary (non-commutative) algebras. The famous Birkhoff--von Neumann Theorem characterizes magic squares as convex combinations of permutation matrices. In the non-commutative case, the corresponding question is: Does every quantum magic square belong to the matrix convex hull of quantum permutation matrices? That is, does every quantum magic square dilate to a quantum permutation matrix? Here we show that this is false even in the simplest non-commutative case. We also classify the quantum magic squares that dilate to a quantum permutation matrix with commuting entries, and prove a quantitative lower bound on the diameter of this set. Finally, we conclude that not all Arveson extreme points of the free…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
