A comparative first-principles investigation on the defect chemistry of TiO$_2$ anatase
Marco Arrigoni, Georg K. H. Madsen

TL;DR
This study compares different computational methods to analyze native point defects in TiO₂ anatase, revealing that semi-local functionals can reliably predict defect properties when aligned properly, with U corrections improving electronic configurations.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of defect property predictions across various DFT approaches, clarifying the reliability of semi-local functionals for TiO₂ anatase defect chemistry.
Findings
Semi-local functionals agree with hybrid functionals when valence band alignment is performed.
Defect formation energies and transition levels are consistent across methods after alignment.
Including a U term improves the accuracy of geometric and electronic defect configurations.
Abstract
Understanding native point defects is fundamental in order to comprehend the properties of TiO anatase in technological applications. Several first-principles studies have been performed in order to investigate the defect chemistry of this material. The reported values are, however, scattered over a wide range. In this manuscript we perform a comparative study employing different approaches based on semilocal, DFT+ and screened hybrid functionals in order to investigate the dependence of defect properties, such as formation energies and charge transition levels, on the employed computational method. While the defects in anatase, like in most transition-metal oxides, generally induce the localization of electrons or holes on atomic sites, we notice that, provided an alignment of the valence bands has been performed, the calculated defect formation energies and transition levels…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
