TL;DR
This study analyzes how language and reference conventions evolve during repeated communication, revealing diverse stable solutions, context-driven word persistence, and systematic simplification of expressions over time.
Contribution
It provides a detailed, data-driven characterization of learning dynamics in reference games, including a new open corpus and insights into how conventions form and stabilize.
Findings
Pairs develop diverse, efficient reference solutions.
Words used more discriminatively initially tend to persist.
Referring expressions become shorter and more efficient over time.
Abstract
The language we use over the course of conversation changes as we establish common ground and learn what our partner finds meaningful. Here we draw upon recent advances in natural language processing to provide a finer-grained characterization of the dynamics of this learning process. We release an open corpus (>15,000 utterances) of extended dyadic interactions in a classic repeated reference game task where pairs of participants had to coordinate on how to refer to initially difficult-to-describe tangram stimuli. We find that different pairs discover a wide variety of idiosyncratic but efficient and stable solutions to the problem of reference. Furthermore, these conventions are shaped by the communicative context: words that are more discriminative in the initial context (i.e. that are used for one target more than others) are more likely to persist through the final repetition.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
