Formal Definitions of Conservative Probability Distribution Functions (PDFs)
Shane Lubold, Clark N. Taylor

TL;DR
This paper introduces both strong and weak formal definitions of conservativeness for probability distribution functions, applicable to various distributions, and analyzes their preservation through data fusion methods to improve uncertainty management.
Contribution
It provides a general, intuitive definition of conservativeness for any distribution and demonstrates how these definitions are preserved or not preserved in data fusion processes.
Findings
Strong conservativeness cannot be used to evaluate data fusion techniques.
Weak conservativeness is preserved by common data fusion methods.
Bayesian updates preserve weak conservativeness.
Abstract
Under ideal conditions, the probability density function (PDF) of a random variable, such as a sensor measurement, would be well known and amenable to computation and communication tasks. However, this is often not the case, so the user looks for some other PDF that approximates the true but intractable PDF. Conservativeness is a commonly sought property of this approximating PDF, especially in distributed or unstructured data systems where the data being fused may contain un-known correlations. Roughly, a conservative approximation is one that overestimates the uncertainty of a system. While prior work has introduced some definitions of conservativeness, these definitions either apply only to normal distributions or violate some of the intuitive appeal of (Gaussian) conservative definitions. This work provides a general and intuitive definition of conservativeness that is applicable to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
