The giant outburst of 4U 0115+634 in 2011 with Suzaku and RXTE
Matthias Bissinger n\'e K\"uhnel (1), Ingo Kreykenbohm (1), Carlo, Ferrigno (2), Katja Pottschmidt (3,4), Diana M. Marcu-Cheatham (3,4), Felix, F\"urst (5), Richard E. Rothschild (6), Peter Kretschmar (5), Dmitry Klochkov, (7), Paul Hemphill (8), Dominik Hertel (1)

TL;DR
This study analyzes X-ray spectra of the high mass X-ray binary 4U 0115+634 during a giant outburst, confirming a fundamental cyclotron line at ~10.2 keV, identifying iron emission lines, and highlighting the impact of continuum models on spectral features.
Contribution
First detailed spectral analysis of 4U 0115+634 during a giant outburst with Suzaku and RXTE, clarifying cyclotron line features and continuum modeling effects.
Findings
Confirmed fundamental cyclotron line at ~10.2 keV
Ruled out previously claimed ~15 keV cyclotron feature
Detected Fe XXV and Fe XXVI emission lines
Abstract
We present an analysis of X-ray spectra of the high mass X-ray binary 4U 0115+634 as observed with Suzaku and RXTE in 2011 July, during the fading phase of a giant X-ray outburst. We used a continuum model consisting of an absorbed cutoff power-law and an ad-hoc Gaussian emission feature centered around 8.5 keV, which we discuss to be due to cyclotron emission. Our results are consistent with a fundamental cyclotron absorption line centered at keV for all observed flux ranges. At the same time we rule out significant influence of the 8.5 kev Gaussian on the CRSF parameters, which are not consistent with the cyclotron line energies and depths of previously reported flux-dependent descriptions. We also show that some continuum models can lead to artificial line-like residuals in the analyzed spectra, which are then misinterpreted as unphysically strong cyclotron lines.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
