Two-User SIMO Interference Channel with TIN: Improper Signaling versus Time-Sharing
Christoph Hellings, Ferhad Askerbeyli, Wolfgang Utschick

TL;DR
This paper investigates the benefits of improper signaling versus proper signaling in two-user SIMO interference channels under different time-sharing scenarios, showing that improper signaling can outperform proper signaling without coded time-sharing.
Contribution
It extends the analysis of improper versus proper signaling to SIMO systems and introduces a novel enhanced channel concept for tight outer bounds with coded time-sharing.
Findings
Improper signaling can outperform proper signaling without coded time-sharing in SIMO channels.
A new composite real gradient-projection method effectively optimizes improper signaling strategies.
The paper provides a numerical approach to compute the TIN rate region with coded time-sharing.
Abstract
In the two-user Gaussian interference channel with Gaussian inputs and treating interference as noise (TIN), improper complex signals can be beneficial if time-sharing is not allowed or if only the data rates are averaged over several transmit strategies (convex hull formulation). On the other hand, proper (circularly symmetric) signals have recently been shown to be optimal if coded time-sharing is considered, i.e., if both the data rates and the transmit powers are averaged. In this paper, we show that both conclusions remain the same if single-input multiple-output (SIMO) systems with multiple antennas at the receivers are considered. The proof for the case with coded time-sharing is via a novel enhanced channel concept for the two-user SIMO interference channel, which turns out to deliver a tight outer bound to the TIN rate region with coded time-sharing. The result for the case…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
