Anti-Alignments -- Measuring The Precision of Process Models and Event Logs
Thomas Chatain (MEXICO, LSV, ENS Paris Saclay), Mathilde Boltenhagen, (LSV, CNRS, MEXICO), Josep Carmona (UPC)

TL;DR
This paper introduces anti-alignments as a novel concept for measuring the precision of process models against observed event logs, providing a new metric that aligns with theoretical axioms and analyzing its computational complexity.
Contribution
The paper proposes anti-alignments for assessing process model precision, offering a metric that adheres to key axioms and includes complexity analysis and experimental validation.
Findings
Anti-alignments effectively identify deviations in process models.
The new precision metric satisfies key theoretical axioms.
Computational complexity analysis informs practical applicability.
Abstract
Processes are a crucial artefact in organizations, since they coordinate the execution of activities so that products and services are provided. The use of models to analyse the underlying processes is a well-known practice. However, due to the complexity and continuous evolution of their processes, organizations need an effective way of analysing the relation between processes and models. Conformance checking techniques asses the suitability of a process model in representing an underlying process, observed through a collection of real executions. One important metric in conformance checking is to asses the precision of the model with respect to the observed executions, i.e., characterize the ability of the model to produce behavior unrelated to the one observed. In this paper we present the notion of anti-alignment as a concept to help unveiling runs in the model that may deviate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
