Modeling Dust and Starlight in Galaxies Observed by Spitzer and Herschel: The KINGFISH Sample
G. Aniano, B.T. Draine, L.K. Hunt, K. Sandstrom, D. Calzetti, R.C., Kennicutt, D.A. Dale, M. Galametz, K.D. Gordon, A.K. Leroy, J.-D.T. Smith, H., Roussel, M. Sauvage, F. Walter, L. Armus, A.D. Bolatto, M. Boquien, A., Crocker, I. De Looze, J. Donovan Meyer, G. Helou, J. Hinz

TL;DR
This study models dust and starlight in galaxies from the KINGFISH sample using multi-wavelength data, providing detailed maps of dust properties and correlations with metallicity, with implications for high-redshift galaxy studies.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive pixel-by-pixel modeling approach for dust and starlight in galaxies, validated with resolved spectral energy distributions and global photometry.
Findings
Dust mass estimates are consistent with global fits.
q_PAH increases with metallicity above a threshold.
Dust-to-gas ratios correlate with galaxy metallicity.
Abstract
Dust and starlight are modeled for the KINGFISH project galaxies. With data from 3.6 micron to 500 micron, models are strongly constrained. For each pixel in each galaxy we estimate (1) dust surface density; (2) q_PAH, the dust mass fraction in PAHs; (3) distribution of starlight intensities heating the dust; (4) luminosity emitted by the dust; and (5) dust luminosity from regions with high starlight intensity. The models successfully reproduce both global and resolved spectral energy distributions. We provide well-resolved maps for the dust properties. As in previous studies, we find q_PAH to be an increasing function of metallicity, above a threshold Z/Z_sol approx 0.15. Dust masses are obtained by summing the dust mass over the map pixels; these "resolved" dust masses are consistent with the masses inferred from model fits to the global photometry. The global dust-to-gas ratios…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
