A New Task for the Philosophy of Science
Nicholas Maxwell

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a new philosophy of science that aligns more closely with the evolving aims of science, aiming to improve scientific rigor and societal benefit.
Contribution
It proposes a novel philosophy of science that integrates evolving scientific aims into practice, fostering a more rigorous and human-centered scientific approach.
Findings
Calls for philosophical reform to match scientific evolution
Suggests philosophy of science should be part of scientific practice
Envisions a more rigorous, human-centered science
Abstract
This paper argues that philosophers of science have before them an important new task that they urgently need to take up. It is to convince the scientific community to adopt and implement a new philosophy of science that does better justice to the deeply problematic basic intellectual aims of science than that which we have at present. Problematic aims evolve with evolving knowledge, that part of philosophy of science concerned with aims and methods thus becoming an integral part of science itself. The outcome of putting this new philosophy into scientific practice would be a new kind of science, both more intellectually rigorous and one that does better justice to the best interests of humanity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Science and Climate Studies
