Galaxy interactions in IllustrisTNG-100, I: The power and limitations of visual identification

TL;DR

This study assesses the effectiveness of visual classification in identifying galaxy interactions using simulated images, revealing significant biases towards massive, recently interacting pairs and highlighting limitations in current observational methods.

Contribution

It demonstrates that visual indicators only correctly identify galaxy interactions about 45% of the time and shows biases toward massive, recent interactions, informing future observational strategies.

Findings

Visual classification correctly identifies ~45% of interacting galaxies.

Massive, recently close pairs are more likely to be visually identified.

Biases in merger rate estimates favor massive, recently interacting galaxies.

Abstract

We present a sample of 446 galaxy pairs constructed using the cosmological simulation IllustrisTNG-100 at z = 0, with M$_{FoF, dm}$ = 10$^{11}$-10$^{13.5}$ M$_{\odot}$. We produce ideal mock SDSS g-band images of all pairs to test the reliability of visual classification schema employed to produce samples of interacting galaxies. We visually classify each image as interacting or not based on the presence of a close neighbour, the presence of stellar debris fields, disturbed discs, and/or tidal features. By inspecting the trajectories of the pairs, we determine that these indicators correctly identify interacting galaxies $\sim45\%$ of the time. We subsequently split the sample into the visually identified interacting pairs (VIP; 38 pairs) and those which are interacting but are not visually identified (nonVIP; 47 pairs). We find that VIP have undergone a close passage nearly twice as recently as the nonVIP, and typically have higher stellar masses. Further, the VIP sit in dark matter haloes that are approximately 2.5 times as massive, in environments nearly 2 times as dense, and are almost a factor of 10 more affected by the tidal forces of their surroundings than the nonVIP. These factors conspire to increase the observability of tidal features and disturbed morphologies, making the VIP more likely to be identified. Thus, merger rate calculations which rely on stellar morphologies are likely to be significantly biased toward massive galaxy pairs which have recently undergone a close passage.