Searching for a response: the intriguing mystery of Feynman's theoretical reference amplifier
Vincenzo d'Alessandro, Santolo Daliento, Marco Di Mauro, Salvatore, Esposito, Adele Naddeo

TL;DR
This paper explores Feynman's 1946 theoretical analysis of amplifier response, introducing a reference model to characterize distortion and stability, with applications to high and low-frequency amplifiers and insights into causality and dispersion relations.
Contribution
It reconstructs Feynman's original theoretical framework for amplifier response, highlighting its novelty in standardizing distortion analysis and stability assessment.
Findings
Developed a benchmark relationship between phase and amplification for each frequency.
Applied the theory to high-frequency cutoff and low-frequency amplifiers.
Discussed the physical interpretations of Feynman's exceptional stability amplifier.
Abstract
We analyze Feynman's work on the response of an amplifier performed at Los Alamos and described in a technical report of 1946, as well as lectured on at the Cornell University in 1946-47 during his course on Mathematical Methods. The motivation for such a work was Feynman's involvement in the Manhattan Project, for which the necessity emerged of feeding the output pulses of counters into amplifiers or several other circuits, with the risk of introducing distortion at each step. In order to deal with such a problem, Feynman designed a theoretical "reference amplifier", thus enabling a characterization of the distortion by means of a benchmark relationship between phase and amplification for each frequency, and providing a standard tool for comparing the operation of real devices. A general theory was elaborated, from which he was able to deduce the basic features of an amplifier just…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
