Information transfer in generalized probabilistic theories based on weak repeatability
Zhaoqi Wu, Shao-Ming Fei, Xianqing Li-Jost, Lin Zhang

TL;DR
This paper extends the understanding of information transfer in generalized probabilistic theories by demonstrating that under weak repeatability, only completely distinguishable states can transfer information, generalizing previous results.
Contribution
It generalizes Zurek's result to GPTs using weak repeatability, showing that distinguishable information transfer implies initial states are fully distinguishable.
Findings
Transfer of distinguishable information requires initial states to be completely distinguishable
Composite system states remain completely distinguishable after invertible transformations
Weak repeatability suffices for the same distinguishability conclusions as strong repeatability
Abstract
Information transfer in generalized probabilistic theories (GPT) is an important problem. We have dealt with the problem based on repeatability postulate, which generalizes Zurek's result to the GPT framework [Phys. Lett. A \textbf{379} (2015) 2694]. A natural question arises: can we deduce the information transfer result under weaker assumptions? In this paper, we generalize Zurek's result to the framework of GPT using weak repeatability postulate. We show that if distinguishable information can be transferred from a physical system to a series of apparatuses under the weak repeatability postulate in GPT, then the initial states of the physical system must be completely distinguishable. Moreover, after each step of invertible transformation, the composite states of the composite system composed of the physical systems and the apparatuses must also be completely distinguishable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
