Separating vascular and neuronal effects of age on fMRI BOLD signals
Kamen A. Tsvetanov, Richard N.A. Henson, James B. Rowe

TL;DR
This paper reviews methods to distinguish vascular and neuronal influences on fMRI BOLD signals in aging, emphasizing the importance of accounting for vascular effects to accurately interpret neurocognitive aging studies.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of current techniques to separate vascular and neuronal components in fMRI data related to aging, highlighting their significance.
Findings
Vascular and neuronal factors influence BOLD signals differently with age.
Few studies have applied correction techniques for vascular effects in aging research.
Neurovascular interactions play a complex role in brain health and disease.
Abstract
Accurate identification of brain function is necessary to understand the neurobiology of cognitive ageing, and thereby promote well-being across the lifespan. A common tool used to investigate neurocognitive ageing is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, although fMRI data are often interpreted in terms of neuronal activity, the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal measured by fMRI includes contributions of both vascular and neuronal factors, which change differentially with age. While some studies investigate vascular ageing factors, the results of these studies are not well known within the field of neurocognitive ageing and therefore vascular confounds in neurocognitive fMRI studies are common. In contrast to over 10,000 BOLD-fMRI papers on ageing, fewer than 20 have applied techniques to correct for vascular effects. However, neurovascular ageing is not only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
