
TL;DR
This paper proposes a new set-theoretic approach to isomorphism that unifies classical foundations with formal treatments of symmetry and transformations without relying on category theory.
Contribution
It introduces a syntactic restriction-based framework where isomorphism naturally emerges within set theory, avoiding the need for category-theoretic formalism.
Findings
Unifies ZFC foundations with isomorphism concepts
Provides a set-theoretic treatment of symmetry and natural transformations
Avoids reliance on category theory in formalizing isomorphism
Abstract
Isomorphism is central to the structure of mathematics and has been formalized in various ways within dependent type theory. All previous treatments have done this by replacing quantification over sets with quantification over groupoids of some form --- categories in which every morphism is an isomorphism. Quantification over sets is replaced by quantification over standard groupoids in the groupoid model, by quantification over infinity groupoid in Homotopy type theory, and by quantification over morphoids in the morphoid model. Here we give a treatment of isomorphism based on the intuitive notion of sets as collections without internal structure. Quantification over sets remains as quantification over sets. Isomorphism and groupoid structure then emerge from simple but subtle syntactic restrictions on set-theoretic language. This approach more fully unifies the classical ZFC…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
