Classifying Diagrams and Their Parts using Graph Neural Networks: A Comparison of Crowd-Sourced and Expert Annotations
Tuomo Hiippala

TL;DR
This paper compares crowd-sourced and expert annotations of diagrams represented as graphs, evaluating their effectiveness in diagram classification and structure learning using graph neural networks.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of crowd-sourced versus expert annotations for diagram graphs in the context of representation learning.
Findings
Expert annotations yield better diagram type representations.
Layout features help learn diagram element identities.
Both annotation types effectively represent diagram structures.
Abstract
This article compares two multimodal resources that consist of diagrams which describe topics in elementary school natural sciences. Both resources contain the same diagrams and represent their structure using graphs, but differ in terms of their annotation schema and how the annotations have been created - depending on the resource in question - either by crowd-sourced workers or trained experts. This article reports on two experiments that evaluate how effectively crowd-sourced and expert-annotated graphs can represent the multimodal structure of diagrams for representation learning using various graph neural networks. The results show that the identity of diagram elements can be learned from their layout features, while the expert annotations provide better representations of diagram types.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Software Engineering Research
