Crisp-determinization of weighted tree automata over strong bimonoids

TL;DR

This paper studies weighted tree automata over strong bimonoids, introducing crisp-determinization, and provides conditions and algorithms for determinization, along with undecidability results for these properties.

Contribution

It defines crisp-deterministic weighted tree automata and establishes conditions for their determinization, including algorithms and undecidability results.

Findings

Crisp-deterministic wta recognize the same class as recognizable step mappings.

Finiteness of the Nerode algebra implies the existence of a crisp-deterministic wta for initial algebra semantics.

Finite order property guarantees a crisp-deterministic wta for run semantics.

Abstract

We consider weighted tree automata (wta) over strong bimonoids and their initial algebra semantics and their run semantics. There are wta for which these semantics are different; however, for bottom-up deterministic wta and for wta over semirings, the difference vanishes. A wta is crisp-deterministic if it is bottom-up deterministic and each transition is weighted by one of the unit elements of the strong bimonoid. We prove that the class of weighted tree languages recognized by crisp-deterministic wta is the same as the class of recognizable step mappings. Moreover, we investigate the following two crisp-determinization problems: for a given wta ${\cal A}$, (a) does there exist a crisp-deterministic wta which computes the initial algebra semantics of ${\cal A}$ and (b) does there exist a crisp-deterministic wta which computes the run semantics of ${\cal A}$? We show that the finiteness of the Nerode algebra ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ of ${\cal A}$ implies a positive answer for (a), and that the finite order property of ${\cal A}$ implies a positive answer for (b). We show a sufficient condition which guarantees the finiteness of ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ and a sufficient condition which guarantees the finite order property of ${\cal A}$. Also, we provide an algorithm for the construction of the crisp-deterministic wta according to (a) if ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ is finite, and similarly for (b) if ${\cal A}$ has finite order property. We prove that it is undecidable whether an arbitrary wta ${\cal A}$ is crisp-determinizable. We also prove that both, the finiteness of ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ and the finite order property of ${\cal A}$ are undecidable.