On Bipartite Distinct Distances in the Plane
Surya Mathialagan

TL;DR
This paper establishes tight bounds on the minimum number of distinct bipartite distances in the plane for sets of points of different sizes, extending classical results and employing combinatorial geometry techniques.
Contribution
It proves the lower bounds matching previous upper bounds for bipartite distances, adapting Székely's crossing number argument and extending Guth and Katz's analysis.
Findings
Lower bound $D(m,n) = oldsymbol{ ext{Ω}}(\sqrt{mn})$ for $m oldsymbol{ ext{≤}} n^{1/3}$
Lower bound $D(m,n) = oldsymbol{ ext{Ω}}(rac{\sqrt{mn}}{ ext{log} ext{n}})$ for $m oldsymbol{ ext{≥}} n^{1/3}$
Elekes' construction is tight for the bipartite distance problem.
Abstract
Given sets of sizes and respectively, we are interested in the number of distinct distances spanned by . Let denote the minimum number of distances determined by sets in of sizes and respectively, where . Elekes \cite{CircleGrids} showed that when . For , we have the upper bound as in the classical distinct distances problem. In this work, we show that Elekes' construction is tight by deriving the lower bound of when . This is done by adapting Sz\'{e}kely's crossing number argument. We also extend the Guth and Katz analysis for the classical distinct distances problem to show a lower bound of $D(m, n) =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
