Radiation hardness study for the COMET Phase-I electronics
Yu Nakazawa, Yuki Fujii, Ewen Gillies, Eitaro Hamada, Youichi, Igarashi, MyeongJae Lee, Manabu Moritsu, Yugo Matsuda, Yuta Miyazaki, Yuki, Nakai, Hiroaki Natori, Kou Oishi, Akira Sato, Yoshi Uchida, Kazuki Ueno,, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, BeomKi Yeo, Hisataka Yoshida, Jie Zhang

TL;DR
This study evaluates the radiation tolerance of commercial electronic components for the COMET Phase-I experiment, ensuring they can withstand high-radiation environments caused by intense muon beams at J-PARC.
Contribution
It provides empirical data on the radiation hardness of specific commercial electronics components under gamma-ray and neutron irradiation for use in high-radiation physics experiments.
Findings
Voltage regulators, ADCs, DACs, and other components meet required radiation tolerance levels.
Components withstand gamma-ray and neutron irradiation up to specified doses.
Results support using commercial electronics in high-radiation experimental setups.
Abstract
Radiation damage on front-end readout and trigger electronics is an important issue in the COMET Phase-I experiment at J-PARC, which plans to search for the neutrinoless transition of a muon to an electron. To produce an intense muon beam, a high-power proton beam impinges on a graphite target, resulting in a high-radiation environment. We require radiation tolerance to a total dose of and equivalent neutron fluence of including a safety factor of 5 over the duration of the physics measurement. The use of commercially-available electronics components which have high radiation tolerance, if such components can be secured, is desirable in such an environment. The radiation hardness of commercial electronic components has been evaluated in gamma-ray and neutron irradiation tests. As results of these tests,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
