Experimental Evidence for Asymptotic Non-Optimality of Comb Adversary Strategy
Zachary Chase

TL;DR
This paper provides computational evidence that the comb strategy for five experts in adversarial prediction is not asymptotically optimal, challenging previous conjectures in the field.
Contribution
It offers the first strong computational evidence against the conjecture that the comb strategy is asymptotically optimal for five experts.
Findings
The comb strategy is not asymptotically optimal for k=5 experts.
Provides computational evidence challenging existing conjectures.
Supports the need for alternative strategies in adversarial prediction.
Abstract
For the problem of prediction with expert advice in the adversarial setting with finite stopping time, we give strong computer evidence that the comb strategy for experts is not asymptotically optimal, thereby giving strong evidence against a conjecture of Gravin, Peres, and Sivan.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Spam and Phishing Detection
