Measuring the BAO peak position with different galaxy selections

TL;DR

This study evaluates how different galaxy selection criteria affect the precision and bias in measuring the BAO scale, finding luminosity and colour selections are more reliable than density-based methods.

Contribution

It introduces a comparative analysis of galaxy selection methods for BAO measurement using mock catalogues, highlighting optimal strategies for future surveys.

Findings

Luminosity and colour selections recover the BAO scale accurately.

Density-based selections introduce biases and higher uncertainties.

Densest galaxy samples show contracted BAO scales, less reliable for precise measurements.

Abstract

We investigate if, for a fixed number density of targets and redshift, there is an optimal way to select a galaxy sample in order to measure the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale, which is used as a standard ruler to constrain the cosmic expansion. Using the mock galaxy catalogue built by Smith et al. in the Millennium-XXL N-body simulation with a technique to assign galaxies to dark matter haloes based on halo occupation distribution modelling, we consider the clustering of galaxies selected by luminosity, colour and local density. We assess how well the BAO scale can be extracted by fitting a template to the power spectrum measured for each sample. We find that the BAO peak position is recovered equally well for samples defined by luminosity or colour, while there is a bias in the BAO scale recovered for samples defined by density. The BAO position is contracted to smaller scales for the densest galaxy quartile and expanded to large scales for the two least dense galaxy quartiles. For fixed galaxy number density, density-selected samples have higher uncertainties in the recovered BAO scale than luminosity- or colour-selected samples.