THOR 2.0: Major Improvements to the Open-Source General Circulation Model
Russell Deitrick, Jo\~ao M. Mendon\c{c}a, Urs Schroffenegger, Simon L., Grimm, Shang-Min Tsai, Kevin Heng

TL;DR
THOR 2.0 introduces major upgrades to the open-source GCM for exoplanet atmospheres, enhancing its physics modules, numerical schemes, and benchmark testing to improve flexibility, stability, and usability.
Contribution
This paper presents significant improvements to THOR, including clearer implementation of the HEVI scheme, new physics modules, and extensive benchmark testing, advancing open-source exoplanet climate modeling.
Findings
Differences between hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic simulations are negligible for Earth but significant for hot Jupiters.
Added physics modules improve model realism for diverse exoplanet atmospheres.
Upgrades enhance model stability, flexibility, and user-friendliness.
Abstract
THOR is the first open-source general circulation model (GCM) developed from scratch to study the atmospheres and climates of exoplanets, free from Earth- or Solar System-centric tunings. It solves the general non-hydrostatic Euler equations (instead of the primitive equations) on a sphere using the icosahedral grid. In the current study, we report major upgrades to THOR, building upon the work of Mendon\c{c}a et al. (2016). First, while the Horizontally Explicit Vertically Implicit (HEVI) integration scheme is the same as that described in Mendon\c{c}a et al. (2016), we provide a clearer description of the scheme and improved its implementation in the code. The differences in implementation between the hydrostatic shallow (HSS), quasi-hydrostatic deep (QHD) and non-hydrostatic deep (NHD) treatments are fully detailed. Second, standard physics modules are added: two-stream, double-gray…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
