Jupiter's heavy-element enrichment expected from formation models
Julia Venturini, Ravit Helled

TL;DR
This study models Jupiter's formation focusing on heavy-element accretion, suggesting its current enrichment can be explained by formation at 1-10 au with specific accretion phases, aligning with structure models.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid pebble-planetesimal accretion model that explains Jupiter's bulk and atmospheric metallicity, integrating detailed formation phases and accretion prescriptions.
Findings
Jupiter's heavy-element content likely formed at 1-10 au.
Accreted 1-15 Earth masses of heavy elements during runaway gas accretion.
Derived planetary mass-metallicity relations under different disk gap conditions.
Abstract
The goal of this work is to investigate Jupiter's growth focusing on the amount of heavy elements accreted by the planet, and its comparison with recent structure models. Our model assumes an initial core growth dominated by pebble accretion, and a second growth phase that is characterized by a moderate accretion of both planetesimals and gas. The third phase is dominated by runaway gas accretion during which the planet becomes detached from the disk. The second and third phases are computed in detail, considering two different prescriptions for the planetesimal accretion and fits from hydrodynamical studies to compute the gas accretion in the detached phase. In order for Jupiter to consist of 20-40 of heavy elements as suggested by structure models, we find that Jupiter's formation location is preferably at an orbital distance of au once the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
