AGN types and unification model
Luigi Spinoglio, Juan Antonio Fern\'andez-Ontiveros

TL;DR
This paper reviews the AGN unification model, highlighting observational challenges to the simple orientation-based explanation and emphasizing the need to incorporate galaxy evolution and variability in future models.
Contribution
It critically examines the limitations of the traditional unification model and advocates for models that include evolutionary processes and host galaxy interactions.
Findings
Dust structures differ from simple torus models.
Type transitions challenge orientation-only explanations.
Galaxy evolution influences AGN types.
Abstract
The motivation of the "unified model" is to explain the main properties of the large zoo of active galactic nuclei with a single physical object. The discovery of broad permitted lines in the polarized spectrum of type 2 Seyfert galaxies in the mid 80's led to the idea of an obscuring torus, whose orientation with respect to our line of sight was the reason of the different optical spectra. However, after many years of observations with different techniques, including IR and mm interferometry, the resulting properties of the observed dust structures differ from the torus model that would be needed to explain the type 1 vs type 2 dichotomy. Moreover, in the last years, multi-frequency monitoring of active galactic nuclei has shown an increasing number of transitions from one type to the other one, which cannot be explained in terms of the simple orientation of the dusty structure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
