Reviewing and Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy
Jun Zhao, Teng Wang, Tao Bai, Kwok-Yan Lam, Zhiying Xu, Shuyu Shi,, Xuebin Ren, Xinyu Yang, Yang Liu, Han Yu

TL;DR
This paper reviews the Gaussian mechanism for differential privacy, identifies limitations in classical approaches for large epsilon, and proposes improved mechanisms with closed-form bounds that achieve better privacy guarantees and utility.
Contribution
The paper derives closed-form upper bounds for the optimal noise amount in $(psilon,elta)$-DP, improving upon classical mechanisms and enabling privacy guarantees for all epsilon values.
Findings
Classical Gaussian mechanisms do not always satisfy $(psilon,elta)$-DP for large epsilon.
Proposed mechanisms achieve $(psilon,elta)$-DP for any epsilon.
Mechanisms improve utility and approximate the optimal Gaussian mechanism.
Abstract
Differential privacy provides a rigorous framework to quantify data privacy, and has received considerable interest recently. A randomized mechanism satisfying -differential privacy (DP) roughly means that, except with a small probability , altering a record in a dataset cannot change the probability that an output is seen by more than a multiplicative factor . A well-known solution to -DP is the Gaussian mechanism initiated by Dwork et al. [1] in 2006 with an improvement by Dwork and Roth [2] in 2014, where a Gaussian noise amount of [1] or of [2] is added independently to each dimension of the query result, for a query with -sensitivity . Although both classical Gaussian mechanisms…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
