Dynamic string-averaging CQ-methods for the split feasibility problem with percentage violation constraints arising in radiation therapy treatment planning
Mark Brooke, Yair Censor, Aviv Gibali

TL;DR
This paper introduces a dynamic string-averaging CQ algorithm for split feasibility problems with percentage violation constraints, motivated by radiation therapy planning, and demonstrates its applicability through numerical examples.
Contribution
It develops a novel string-averaging CQ method tailored for non-convex constraints arising in radiation therapy, extending existing algorithms to handle percentage violation constraints.
Findings
The proposed method effectively handles non-convex constraints in radiation therapy planning.
Numerical examples demonstrate the algorithm's practical applicability.
Theoretical extension to non-convex sets remains open.
Abstract
In this paper we study a feasibility-seeking problem with percentage violation constraints. These are additional constraints, that are appended to an existing family of constraints, which single out certain subsets of the existing constraints and declare that up to a specified fraction of the number of constraints in each subset is allowed to be violated by up to a specified percentage of the existing bounds. Our motivation to investigate problems with percentage violation constraints comes from the field of radiation therapy treatment planning wherein the fully-discretized inverse planning problem is formulated as a split feasibility problem and the percentage violation constraints give rise to non-convex constraints. Following the CQ algorithm of Byrne (2002, Inverse Problems, Vol. 18, pp. 441-53), we develop a string-averaging CQ method that uses only projections onto the individual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
