Automatic prediction of suicidal risk in military couples using multimodal interaction cues from couples conversations
Sandeep Nallan Chakravarthula, Md Nasir, Shao-Yen Tseng, Haoqi Li, Tae, Jin Park, Brian Baucom, Craig J. Bryan, Shrikanth Narayanan, Panayiotis, Georgiou

TL;DR
This study explores whether multimodal cues from military couples' conversations can automatically predict suicidal risk levels, aiming for early detection using speech and behavior analysis in real-world noisy environments.
Contribution
It introduces an automatic system that classifies suicidal risk from multimodal interaction cues, demonstrating effectiveness in real-world noisy conditions and highlighting the importance of behavior and turn-taking cues.
Findings
Automatic system outperforms chance in classifying suicidal risk levels.
Behavior and turn-taking cues are the most informative features.
Gender and topic conditioning improve classification accuracy.
Abstract
Suicide is a major societal challenge globally, with a wide range of risk factors, from individual health, psychological and behavioral elements to socio-economic aspects. Military personnel, in particular, are at especially high risk. Crisis resources, while helpful, are often constrained by access to clinical visits or therapist availability, especially when needed in a timely manner. There have hence been efforts on identifying whether communication patterns between couples at home can provide preliminary information about potential suicidal behaviors, prior to intervention. In this work, we investigate whether acoustic, lexical, behavior and turn-taking cues from military couples' conversations can provide meaningful markers of suicidal risk. We test their effectiveness in real-world noisy conditions by extracting these cues through an automatic diarization and speech recognition…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
