Warning Signs in Communicating the Machine Learning Detection Results of Misinformation with Individuals
Limeng Cui

TL;DR
This study investigates how machine learning warning signs influence users' perceptions and behaviors regarding misinformation, revealing that such signs reduce uncertainty but do not significantly affect trust.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to communicating ML detection results through warning signs and evaluates their impact on user trust and sharing decisions.
Findings
Warning signs reduce users' uncertainty about news authenticity.
Trust in fake news was not significantly affected by warning signs.
Social media experience influences trust and sharing behavior.
Abstract
With the prevalence of misinformation online, researchers have focused on developing various machine learning algorithms to detect fake news. However, users' perception of machine learning outcomes and related behaviors have been widely ignored. Hence, this paper proposed to bridge this gap by studying how to pass the detection results of machine learning to the users, and aid their decisions in handling misinformation. An online experiment was conducted, to evaluate the effect of the proposed machine learning warning sign against a control condition. We examined participants' detection and sharing of news. The data showed that warning sign's effects on participants' trust toward the fake news were not significant. However, we found that people's uncertainty about the authenticity of the news dropped with the presence of the machine learning warning sign. We also found that social media…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Media Influence and Health · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
