K-MACE and Kernel K-MACE Clustering
Soosan Beheshti, Edward Nidoy, and Faizan Rahman

TL;DR
This paper introduces K-MACE and Kernel K-MACE, novel methods for estimating the number of clusters in data, improving clustering accuracy and kernel parameter tuning through a new validity index approach.
Contribution
It proposes the k-minimizing Average Central Error (KMACE) validity index and an automatic kernel parameter tuning method, enhancing cluster number estimation and clustering performance.
Findings
K-MACE outperforms traditional methods in estimating the correct number of clusters.
Kernel K-MACE achieves superior clustering accuracy on synthetic and real data.
Automatic kernel parameter tuning improves clustering results without manual intervention.
Abstract
Determining the correct number of clusters (CNC) is an important task in data clustering and has a critical effect on finalizing the partitioning results. K-means is one of the popular methods of clustering that requires CNC. Validity index methods use an additional optimization procedure to estimate the CNC for K-means. We propose an alternative validity index approach denoted by k-minimizing Average Central Error (KMACE). K-means is one of the popular methods of clustering that requires CNC. Validity ACE is the average error between the true unavailable cluster center and the estimated cluster center for each sample data. Kernel K-MACE is kernel K-means that is equipped with an efficient CNC estimator. In addition, kernel K_MACE includes the first automatically tuned procedure for choosing the Gaussian kernel parameters. Simulation results for both synthetic and read data show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
