Decoding the radial velocity variations of HD41248 with ESPRESSO
J. P. Faria, V. Adibekyan, E. M. Amazo-G\'omez, S. C. C. Barros, J. D., Camacho, O. Demangeon, P. Figueira, A. Mortier, M. Oshagh, F. Pepe, N. C., Santos, J. Gomes da Silva, A. R. Costa Silva, S. G. Sousa, S. Ulmer-Moll, and, P. T. P. Viana

TL;DR
This study uses ESPRESSO and HARPS data, combined with Bayesian noise models and TESS photometry, to analyze stellar activity and search for exoplanets around HD41248, concluding that stellar activity explains the observed RV variations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of Gaussian process models in disentangling stellar activity from planetary signals in radial velocity data.
Findings
Gaussian process model explains RV data well
Stellar rotation period matches TESS light curve
No definitive planetary signals detected with advanced noise models
Abstract
Twenty-four years after the discoveries of the first exoplanets, the radial-velocity (RV) method is still one of the most productive techniques to detect and confirm exoplanets. But stellar magnetic activity can induce RV variations large enough to make it difficult to disentangle planet signals from the stellar noise. In this context, HD41248 is an interesting planet-host candidate, with RV observations plagued by activity-induced signals. We report on ESPRESSO observations of HD41248 and analyse them together with previous observations from HARPS with the goal of evaluating the presence of orbiting planets. Using different noise models within a general Bayesian framework designed for planet detection in RV data, we test the significance of the various signals present in the HD41248 dataset. We use Gaussian processes as well as a first-order moving average component to try to correct…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
