Time Travel Paradoxes and Multiple Histories
Jacob Hauser, Barak Shoshany

TL;DR
This paper introduces mathematical models of multiple histories to resolve time travel paradoxes, exploring their properties, cyclicity, and potential experimental distinguishability, extending existing self-consistency ideas.
Contribution
It presents novel models of multiple histories using branching spacetimes and covering spaces, providing concrete examples and analyzing their implications for time travel paradoxes.
Findings
Histories can be finite and cyclic under certain conditions.
The models extend the Novikov self-consistency conjecture to multiple histories.
Possible experimental methods to distinguish multiple histories from other theories.
Abstract
If time travel is possible, it seems to inevitably lead to paradoxes. These include consistency paradoxes, such as the famous grandfather paradox, and bootstrap paradoxes, where something is created out of nothing. One proposed class of resolutions to these paradoxes allows for multiple histories (or timelines), such that any changes to the past occur in a new history, independent of the one where the time traveler originated. We introduce a simple mathematical model for a spacetime with a time machine, and suggest two possible multiple-histories models, making use of branching spacetimes and covering spaces respectively. We use these models to construct novel and concrete examples of multiple-histories resolutions to time travel paradoxes, and we explore questions such as whether one can ever come back to a previously visited history and whether a finite or infinite number of histories…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
