Voltage-Driven Translocation: Defining a Capture Radius
Le Qiao, Maxime Ignacio, and Gary W. Slater

TL;DR
This paper investigates the concept of the capture radius in voltage-driven analyte translocation through nanopores, analyzing how boundary conditions, pore size, and experimental times influence its definition and estimation.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical and simulation-based analysis of the capture radius, clarifying its ambiguous definition and the factors affecting its measurement.
Findings
Boundary conditions significantly affect R* estimation
Finite experimental times influence capture radius calculations
Monte Carlo simulations support theoretical analysis
Abstract
Analyte translocation involves three phases: (i) diffusion in the loading solution; (ii) capture by the pore; (iii) threading. The capture process remains poorly characterized because it cannot easily be visualized or inferred from indirect measurements. The capture performance of a device is often described by a \textit{capture radius} generally defined as the radial distance at which diffusion-dominated dynamics cross over to field-induced drift. However, this definition is rather ambiguous and the related models are usually over-simplified and studied in the steady-state limit. We investigate different approaches to defining and estimating for a charged particle diffusing in a liquid and attracted to the nanopore by the electric field. We present a theoretical analysis of the P\'{e}clet number as well as Monte Carlo simulations with different simulation protocols. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
