Sparsity through evolutionary pruning prevents neuronal networks from overfitting
Richard C. Gerum, Andr\'e Erpenbeck, Patrick Krauss, Achim Schilling

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that evolutionary pruning of neural networks to induce sparsity enhances their ability to generalize, suggesting that sparsity is a key property for developing more brain-like AI systems.
Contribution
It introduces an evolutionary pruning method that creates sparse neural networks, improving generalization in a maze task, highlighting the importance of sparsity in neural network design.
Findings
Pruning improves network generalization performance.
Sparse networks outperform fully connected ones.
Evolutionary training fosters beneficial sparsity patterns.
Abstract
Modern Machine learning techniques take advantage of the exponentially rising calculation power in new generation processor units. Thus, the number of parameters which are trained to resolve complex tasks was highly increased over the last decades. However, still the networks fail - in contrast to our brain - to develop general intelligence in the sense of being able to solve several complex tasks with only one network architecture. This could be the case because the brain is not a randomly initialized neural network, which has to be trained by simply investing a lot of calculation power, but has from birth some fixed hierarchical structure. To make progress in decoding the structural basis of biological neural networks we here chose a bottom-up approach, where we evolutionarily trained small neural networks in performing a maze task. This simple maze task requires dynamical decision…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
