Comparing Effective One Body Hamiltonians for spin-aligned coalescing binaries
Piero Rettegno, Fabio Martinetti, Alessandro Nagar, Donato Bini,, Gunnar Riemenschneider, and Thibault Damour

TL;DR
This paper compares two semi-analytical gravitational waveform models, TEOBResumS and SEOBNRv4, focusing on their Hamiltonians for spin-aligned black hole binaries, revealing differences in spin effects and demonstrating efficient waveform generation.
Contribution
It provides an analytical comparison of the Hamiltonians underlying TEOBResumS and SEOBNRv4 models, introducing a new form of the SEOBNRv4 Hamiltonian and exploring its computational advantages.
Findings
The Hamiltonians differ mainly in their spin effect implementations.
A new centrifugal radius formulation for SEOBNRv4 Hamiltonian is proposed.
Post-adiabatic approximation enables long-inspiral waveform generation with low computational cost.
Abstract
TEOBResumS and SEOBNRv4 are the two existing semi-analytical gravitational waveform models for spin-aligned coalescing black hole binaries based on the effective-one-body approach.They are informed by numerical relativity simulations and provide the relative dynamics and waveforms from early inspiral to plunge, merger and ringdown The central building block of each model is the EOB resummed Hamiltonian.The two models implement different Hamiltonians that are both deformations of the Hamiltonian of a test spinning black hole moving around a Kerr black hole.Here we analytically compare, element by element, the two Hamiltonians. In particular: we illustrate that one can introduce a centrifugal radius SEOBNRv4, so to rewrite the Hamiltonian in a more compact form that is analogous to the one of TEOBResumS.The latter centrifugal radius cannot, however, be identified with the one used in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
