Is Trans-Planckian Censorship a Swampland Conjecture?
Ryo Saito, Satoshi Shirai, Masahito Yamazaki

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the trans-Planckian censorship conjecture (TCC), highlighting conceptual issues and its implications for the landscape of quantum gravity theories, questioning whether TCC functions as a swampland conjecture.
Contribution
The paper introduces multiple versions of the TCC, analyzes their conceptual problems, and discusses how these variations impact observable predictions and the classification of theories in quantum gravity.
Findings
Different TCC versions lead to observable differences.
Violation of TCC in another universe can exclude a theory.
TCC's role as a swampland conjecture remains uncertain.
Abstract
During an accelerated expansion of the Universe, quantum fluctuations of sub-Planckian size can be stretched outside the horizon and be regarded effectively classical. Recently, it has been conjectured that such horizon-crossing of trans-Planckian modes never happens inside theories of quantum gravity (the trans-Planckian censorship conjecture, TCC). We point out several conceptual problems of this conjecture, which is in itself formulated as a statement on the restriction of possible scenarios in a theory: by contrast a standard swampland conjecture is a restriction of possible theories in the landscape of the quantum gravity. We emphasize the concept of swampland universality, i.e. that a swampland conjecture constrains any possible scenario in a given effective field theory. In order to illustrate the problems clearly we introduce several versions of the conjecture, where TCC…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
