Moral Dilemmas for Artificial Intelligence: a position paper on an application of Compositional Quantum Cognition
Camilo M. Signorelli, Xerxes D. Arsiwalla

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a new approach to evaluating AI by incorporating compositional quantum cognition, aiming to better reflect human-like reasoning, decision-making, and knowledge transfer capabilities.
Contribution
It proposes a novel framework using quantum cognition and categorical compositional models to assess AI's complex, subjective, and emotionally influenced decision processes.
Findings
Introduces a compositional quantum cognition framework for AI evaluation
Highlights the importance of emotional and rational reasoning in AI
Suggests a concrete implementation using recent quantum cognition models
Abstract
Traditionally, the way one evaluates the performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system is via a comparison to human performance in specific tasks, treating humans as a reference for high-level cognition. However, these comparisons leave out important features of human intelligence: the capability to transfer knowledge and make complex decisions based on emotional and rational reasoning. These decisions are influenced by current inferences as well as prior experiences, making the decision process strongly subjective and apparently biased. In this context, a definition of compositional intelligence is necessary to incorporate these features in future AI tests. Here, a concrete implementation of this will be suggested, using recent developments in quantum cognition, natural language and compositional meaning of sentences, thanks to categorical compositional models of meaning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
