Identifying possible pairing states in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ by tunneling spectroscopy
Shu-Ichiro Suzuki, Masatoshi Sato, and Yukio Tanaka

TL;DR
This study uses tunneling spectroscopy and theoretical modeling to differentiate between possible pairing symmetries in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, finding that certain states are inconsistent with experiments and proposing ways to distinguish others.
Contribution
It applies Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk theory to analyze tunneling conductance for various pairing states in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, providing a method to identify the correct pairing symmetry.
Findings
Chiral d-wave pairing is inconsistent with c-axis tunneling experiments.
In-plane tunneling spectroscopy can distinguish between helical p-wave and f-wave states.
The study offers a theoretical framework for identifying pairing symmetry in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.
Abstract
We examine the tunneling spectroscopy of three-dimensional normal-metal/SrRuO junctions as an experimental means to identify pairing symmetry in SrRuO. In particular, we consider three different possible pairing states in SrRuO: spin-singlet chiral -wave, spin-triplet helical -wave, and spin-nematic -wave ones, all of which are consistent with recent nuclear-magnetic-resonance experiments [A. Pustogow et al., Nature 574, 72 (2019)]. The Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk theory is employed to calculate the tunneling conductance, and the cylindrical two-dimensional Fermi surface of SrRuO is properly taken into account as an anisotropic effective mass and a cutoff in the momentum integration. It is pointed out that the chiral -wave pairing state is inconsistent with previous tunneling conductance experiments along the -axis. We also find that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
