A mirage of the cosmic shoreline: Venus-like clouds as a statistical false positive for exoplanet atmospheric erosion
Jacob Lustig-Yaeger, Victoria S. Meadows, Andrew P. Lincowski

TL;DR
This study explores how Venus-like clouds can create false positives in exoplanet atmospheric erosion detection, emphasizing the importance of advanced observational techniques with JWST to accurately characterize terrestrial exoplanets.
Contribution
It demonstrates that JWST can probe deeper atmospheric layers in Venus-like exoplanets and identifies cloud-related ambiguities that may mimic signs of atmospheric escape.
Findings
JWST/MIRI can probe deeper atmospheres than transmission spectroscopy.
Cloud ambiguities can mimic atmospheric escape signatures.
Thicker atmospheres may appear at lower stellar insolation, causing false positives.
Abstract
Near-term studies of Venus-like atmospheres with JWST promise to advance our knowledge of terrestrial planet evolution. However, the remote study of Venus in the Solar System and the ongoing efforts to characterize gaseous exoplanets both suggest that high altitude aerosols could limit observational studies of lower atmospheres, and potentially make it challenging to recognize exoplanets as "Venus-like". To support practical approaches for exo-Venus characterization with JWST, we use Venus-like atmospheric models with self-consistent cloud formation of the seven TRAPPIST-1 exoplanets to investigate the atmospheric depth that can be probed using both transmission and emission spectroscopy. We find that JWST/MIRI LRS secondary eclipse emission spectroscopy in the 6 m opacity window could probe at least an order of magnitude deeper pressures than transmission spectroscopy, potentially…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
