To beta or not to beta: can higher-order Jeans analysis break the mass-anisotropy degeneracy in simulated dwarfs?
Anna Genina, Justin I. Read, Carlos S. Frenk, Shaun Cole, Alejandro, Benitez-Llambay, Aaron D. Ludlow, Julio F. Navarro, Kyle A. Oman, Andrew, Robertson

TL;DR
This study evaluates GravSphere, a non-parametric higher-order Jeans analysis method, on simulated dwarf galaxies to assess its accuracy in recovering dark matter profiles and breaking the mass-anisotropy degeneracy.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that GravSphere provides accurate mass and density profiles for simulated dwarfs, with improved uncertainties over traditional Jeans methods, and explores the impact of priors and data constraints.
Findings
Mass profiles are recovered within 10% bias for CDM dwarfs.
Uncertainties are smaller than traditional Jeans methods.
Bias towards cuspy profiles in SIDM dwarfs due to data constraints.
Abstract
We test a non-parametric higher-order Jeans analysis method, GravSphere, on 32 simulated dwarf galaxies comparable to classical Local Group dwarfs like Fornax. The galaxies are selected from the APOSTLE suite of cosmological hydrodynamics simulations with Cold Dark Matter (CDM) and Self-Interacting Dark Matter (SIDM) models, allowing us to investigate cusps and cores in density distributions. We find that, for CDM dwarfs, the recovered enclosed mass profiles have a bias of no more than 10 per cent, with a 50 per cent scatter in the inner regions and a 20 per cent scatter near the half-light radius, consistent with standard mass estimators. The density profiles are also recovered with a bias of no more than 10 per cent and a scatter of 30 per cent in the inner regions. For SIDM dwarfs, the mass and density profiles are recovered within our 95 per cent confidence intervals, but are biased…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
