Thermodynamic Equilibrium in General Relativity
J. A. S. Lima (Departamento de Astronomia, Universidade de Sao Paulo),, A. Del Popolo (Catania University), A. R. Plastino (CeBio y Departamento de, Ciencias Basicas, Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos, Aires, UNNOBA)

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the conditions for thermodynamic equilibrium in static self-gravitating fluids within general relativity, showing a unified relation between temperature and chemical potential that extends beyond the classical Tolman-Ehrenfest law.
Contribution
It proves a more general relation linking temperature and chemical potential in equilibrium, valid for any equation of state, and clarifies the conditions under which the original law applies.
Findings
Unified relation between temperature and chemical potential in equilibrium.
Original Tolman-Ehrenfest law applies only when chemical potential vanishes.
Derived temperature expressions for isothermal gas and neutron star models.
Abstract
The thermodynamic equilibrium condition for a static self-gravitating fluid in the Einstein theory is defined by the Tolman-Ehrenfest temperature law, , according to which the proper temperature depends explicitly on the position within the medium through the metric coefficient . By assuming the validity of Tolman-Ehrenfest "pocket temperature", Klein also proved a similar relation for the chemical potential, namely, . In this letter we prove that a more general relation uniting both quantities holds regardless of the equation of state satisfied by the medium, and that the original Tolman-Ehrenfest law form is valid only if the chemical potential vanishes identically. In the general case of equilibrium, the temperature and the chemical potential are intertwined in such a way that only a definite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
