LionForests: Local Interpretation of Random Forests
Ioannis Mollas, Nick Bassiliades, Ioannis Vlahavas, Grigorios, Tsoumakas

TL;DR
LionForests introduces a novel method for interpreting random forests by using unsupervised learning and similarity metrics, transforming black-box models into understandable rules to enhance trust and transparency.
Contribution
The paper presents LionForests, a new approach that makes random forests interpretable through unsupervised techniques and similarity measures, revealing transparent rules from ensemble predictions.
Findings
Enables interpretation of random forests as simple rules
Uses unsupervised learning to explore forest structure
Improves trust in machine learning predictions
Abstract
Towards a future where machine learning systems will integrate into every aspect of people's lives, researching methods to interpret such systems is necessary, instead of focusing exclusively on enhancing their performance. Enriching the trust between these systems and people will accelerate this integration process. Many medical and retail banking/finance applications use state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to predict certain aspects of new instances. Tree ensembles, like random forests, are widely acceptable solutions on these tasks, while at the same time they are avoided due to their black-box uninterpretable nature, creating an unreasonable paradox. In this paper, we provide a methodology for shedding light on the predictions of the misjudged family of tree ensemble algorithms. Using classic unsupervised learning techniques and an enhanced similarity metric, to wander…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
