Synthetic Controls with Imperfect Pre-Treatment Fit
Bruno Ferman, Cristine Pinto

TL;DR
This paper examines the biases of Synthetic Control methods under imperfect pre-treatment fit, proposing a demeaned version that reduces bias and variance, along with a test for its validity, guiding empirical application.
Contribution
It introduces a demeaned Synthetic Control estimator that improves bias and variance properties under imperfect pre-treatment fit, with a new specification test.
Findings
Demeaned SC reduces bias compared to standard SC.
Demeaned SC outperforms difference-in-differences in variance.
Provides a practical test for the validity of the demeaned SC estimator.
Abstract
We analyze the properties of the Synthetic Control (SC) and related estimators when the pre-treatment fit is imperfect. In this framework, we show that these estimators are generally biased if treatment assignment is correlated with unobserved confounders, even when the number of pre-treatment periods goes to infinity. Still, we show that a demeaned version of the SC method can substantially improve in terms of bias and variance relative to the difference-in-difference estimator. We also derive a specification test for the demeaned SC estimator in this setting with imperfect pre-treatment fit. Given our theoretical results, we provide practical guidance for applied researchers on how to justify the use of such estimators in empirical applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
