TL;DR
This paper compares Bayesian Neural Network models for estimating cosmological parameters from CMB data, demonstrating Flipout's superior performance and showing how BNNs can accelerate MCMC convergence and improve parameter constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive comparison of BNN sampling methods for CMB parameter estimation and provides a practical guide for training multi-channel BNNs with reliable uncertainty estimates.
Findings
Flipout outperforms other BNN sampling methods.
BNNs provide faster inference than MCMC, enabling better initial proposals.
Combining polarization data with temperature improves parameter constraints.
Abstract
In this paper, we present the first study that compares different models of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) to predict the posterior distribution of the cosmological parameters directly from the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and polarization maps. We focus our analysis on four different methods to sample the weights of the network during training: Dropout, DropConnect, Reparameterization Trick (RT), and Flipout. We find out that Flipout outperforms all other methods regardless of the architecture used, and provides tighter constraints for the cosmological parameters. Moreover we compare with MCMC posterior analysis obtaining comparable error correlation among parameters, with BNNs being orders of magnitude faster in inference, although less accurate. Thanks to the speed of the inference process with BNNs, the posterior distribution, outcome of the neural network, can be used…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSPEED: Separable Pyramidal Pooling EncodEr-Decoder for Real-Time Monocular Depth Estimation on Low-Resource Settings · DropConnect · Dropout
