The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Wave Memory
K. Aggarwal, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S., Burke-Spolaor, S. Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T., Cromartie, K. Crowter, M. Decesar, P. B. Demorest, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R., D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, E. Fonseca

TL;DR
This paper uses 11-year pulsar timing data from NANOGrav to search for gravitational wave memory signals from supermassive black hole mergers, setting upper limits on event rates and strain amplitudes, and comparing with previous data.
Contribution
First to place limits on gravitational wave memory event rates and strain amplitudes using the NANOGrav 11-year data set.
Findings
No evidence of GW memory detected.
Set a strain upper limit of 2.5×10⁻¹⁴.
Limited the rate of GW memory events to less than 0.4 per year.
Abstract
The mergers of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) promise to be incredible sources of gravitational waves (GWs). While the oscillatory part of the merger gravitational waveform will be outside the frequency sensitivity range of pulsar timing arrays (PTAs), the non-oscillatory GW memory effect is detectable. Further, any burst of gravitational waves will produce GW memory, making memory a useful probe of unmodeled exotic sources and new physics. We searched the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) 11-year data set for GW memory. This dataset is sensitive to very low frequency GWs of to nHz (periods of yr mon). Finding no evidence for GWs, we placed limits on the strain amplitude of GW memory events during the observation period. We then used the strain upper limits to place limits on the rate of GW memory causing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
