TL;DR
This paper critically examines GCN-based models for knowledge graph entity alignment, highlighting implementation discrepancies, necessary tricks for model success, and providing a comprehensive evaluation of datasets and methods.
Contribution
It offers an in-depth analysis of GCN-based entity alignment, revealing implementation issues, essential techniques, and systematizing benchmark datasets for improved understanding.
Findings
Implementation differences affect results significantly
Certain tricks are crucial for model performance
Benchmark datasets vary in difficulty and suitability
Abstract
In this work, we focus on the problem of entity alignment in Knowledge Graphs (KG) and we report on our experiences when applying a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) based model for this task. Variants of GCN are used in multiple state-of-the-art approaches and therefore it is important to understand the specifics and limitations of GCN-based models. Despite serious efforts, we were not able to fully reproduce the results from the original paper and after a thorough audit of the code provided by authors, we concluded, that their implementation is different from the architecture described in the paper. In addition, several tricks are required to make the model work and some of them are not very intuitive. We provide an extensive ablation study to quantify the effects these tricks and changes of architecture have on final performance. Furthermore, we examine current evaluation approaches…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsGraph Convolutional Network
