Understanding parameter differences between analyses employing nested data subsets
Steven Gratton, Anthony Challinor

TL;DR
This paper offers an analytical framework to interpret parameter shifts between full datasets and subsets, helping assess data consistency and model fit by distinguishing genuine changes from noise-induced variations.
Contribution
It introduces a method to quantify expected parameter differences due to noise, aiding in evaluating data coherence and model appropriateness.
Findings
Provides a measure for interpreting parameter shifts
Helps distinguish noise from genuine data changes
Assists in assessing model fit and data consistency
Abstract
We provide an analytical argument for understanding the likely nature of parameter shifts between those coming from an analysis of a dataset and from a subset of that dataset, assuming differences are down to noise and any intrinsic variance alone. This gives us a measure against which we can interpret changes seen in parameters and make judgements about the coherency of the data and the suitability of a model in describing those data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
