Calibration of RADMON Radiation Monitor Onboard Aalto-1 CubeSat
Philipp Oleynik (1), Rami Vainio (1), Arttu Punkkinen (1), Oleksiy, Dudnik (3), Jan Gieseler (1), Hannu-Pekka Hedman (2), Heli Hietala (1),, Edward H{\ae}ggstr\"om (5), Petri Niemel\"a (4), Juhani Peltonen (1), Jaan, Praks (4), Risto Punkkinen (2), Tero S\"antti (2)

TL;DR
This paper details the calibration process and response characterization of the RADMON radiation monitor on the Aalto-1 CubeSat, including ground and in-flight calibration, simulations, and response analysis for particles.
Contribution
It presents the first comprehensive calibration and response analysis of RADMON radiation monitor on a CubeSat, including in-flight calibration and simulation-based characterization.
Findings
Energy calibration margin of about 5% achieved
Full response characterization to protons and electrons provided
Proton contamination of electron channels quantified and discussed
Abstract
RADMON is a small radiation monitor designed and assembled by students of the University of Turku and the University of Helsinki. It is flown on-board Aalto-1, a 3-unit CubeSat in low Earth orbit at about 500 km altitude. The detector unit of the instrument consists of two detectors, a Si solid-state detector and a CsI(Tl) scintillator, and utilizes the \textDelta{E}-E technique to determine the total energy and species of each particle hitting the detector. We present the results of the on-ground and in-flight calibration campaigns of the instrument, as well as the characterization of its response through extensive simulations within the Geant4 framework. The overall energy calibration margin achieved is about 5\%. The full instrument response to protons and electrons is presented and the issue of proton contamination of the electron channels is quantified and discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
