The Overlap Gap Property and Approximate Message Passing Algorithms for $p$-spin models
David Gamarnik, Aukosh Jagannath

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of Approximate Message Passing algorithms in p-spin models, demonstrating that the Overlap Gap Property acts as a barrier to finding near ground states when p ≥ 4.
Contribution
The paper links the Overlap Gap Property to the failure of AMP algorithms in p-spin models and extends the analysis to TAP-based iterations, providing new insights into computational barriers.
Findings
OGP likely exists for p ≥ 4 in p-spin models
AMP algorithms fail to find near ground states under OGP
TAP-based iterations also fail under the same conditions
Abstract
We consider the algorithmic problem of finding a near ground state (near optimal solution) of a -spin model. We show that for a class of algorithms broadly defined as Approximate Message Passing (AMP), the presence of the Overlap Gap Property (OGP), appropriately defined, is a barrier. We conjecture that when the model does indeed exhibits OGP (and prove it for the space of binary solutions). Assuming the validity of this conjecture, as an implication, the AMP fails to find near ground states in these models, per our result. We extend our result to the problem of finding pure states by means of Thouless, Anderson and Palmer (TAP) based iterations, which is yet another example of AMP type algorithms. We show that such iterations fail to find pure states approximately, subject to the conjecture that the space of pure states exhibits the OGP, appropriately stated, when .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
